Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Texas Connection

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:49, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Texas Connection (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article has had a notability tag for three years, with no sources added; all links in the article are dead, and the only search hit is a Facebook page Bryanrutherford0 (talk) 22:57, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:32, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Amusingly, the article has for years been "within the scope of" WikiProject US/WikiProject Texas only, even though it's a festival in Alberta. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:11, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Canuckle: Your first link does mention the event, but seems to mostly be covering that particular artist. The second is a 404 error? -Bryanrutherford0 (talk) 21:13, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I found the article he was trying to link to, and fixed the link — he accidentally left out a space between the end of the URL and the title he was trying to wrap over it. Bearcat (talk) 04:07, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
That's not great sourcing, though. The Red Deer Advocate link just namechecks the existence of the festival in an article that isn't about the festival — and the Innisfail Province is a community weekly newspaper which would be acceptable for some supplementary confirmation of facts after the festival had already been daily-newspapered over GNG, but cannot carry GNG in and of itself if it's the best source you can come up with. So no, unfortunately those links haven't changed anything. Bearcat (talk) 04:07, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:37, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:37, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:37, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.