Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Terri Sue Webb

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC(talk) 03:48, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Terri Sue Webb

Terri Sue Webb (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails notability, WP:BIO, WP:CRIME. She been arrested a number of times, but being nude in public is not notable and she doesn't seem to have a large following. Rusf10 (talk) 05:48, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I am also nominating the following related pages for similar reasons:

The Freedom to be Yourself (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Jacob Gabriel (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)- He is a filmmaker but I can't find any of his films even listed on IMDB and they have everything on there.
Charles MacFarland (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Jennifer Moss (activist) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

--Rusf10 (talk) 06:08, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Oregon-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 08:52, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 08:53, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: To get more opinions about this mass nomination.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 07:05, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- HindWikiConnect 00:46, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. To add to the above, this was created by SPA whose only edits are to service this article. Seems to be either vanity or fanpage, given all the OR. Agricola44 (talk) 17:16, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.