Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Terminus (typeface)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 04:05, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Terminus (typeface)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I do not believe this typeface meets the Wikipedia definitions for inclusion, due to a lack of non-trivial coverage from third parties. AMFMUHFVHF90922 (talk) 20:00, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This article looks nice but does not meet WP:N. No assertion of notability is made and the coverage which can be verified is trivial mention in lists. Blue Rasberry (talk) 21:17, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 10:15, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, v/r - T P 03:11, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KTC (talk) 20:35, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This typeface has some notability, showing up on a number of top-ten lists of monospace/programmer/CLI fonts. But in all cases, these lists were from blogs, which are considered unreliable. I could not find any reliable secondary sources discussing this typeface in depth. Unfortunately, the topic fails notability guidelines, per WP:GNG. --Mark viking (talk) 22:55, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.