Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tema Development Corporation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Tema. ✗plicit 13:03, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tema Development Corporation

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

city agency, not independently notable DGG ( talk ) 04:45, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:56, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ghana-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:56, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep or Merge to Tema. While the article is short and all sources don't have in-depth coverage, it does indicate that the corporation has some history that has attracted interest from a housing development model. There are also newer sources including these mentioning its diminished role in Tema and negative perceptions of the company, its liquidity and appeal to become a Limited Liability Corporation to expand its operations, its dispute with a church, protests against its proposed land sale, its demolition of a pastor's home, its current projects, and conflict between it and the Tema Metropolitan Assembly. —Ost (talk) 18:39, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 06:55, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Ost (talk) 19:52, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 12:08, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I think a merge would be satisfactory. DGG ( talk ) 06:26, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Tema as WP:ATD, on its own this topic fails our notability guideline NCORP — Preceding unsigned comment added by HighKing (talk • contribs) 12:16, January 24, 2022 (UTC)
Merge to Tema. No evidence that this is notable separately from the parent city government. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 22:53, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.