Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tehreek Nizam-e-Mustafa

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:38, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Tehreek Nizam-e-Mustafa (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Everyone knows about the political party Pakistan National Alliance, who uses similar term. But there is nothing in my searches for this group. It looks like that it is local one with no real activities. Maybe we should redirect? Fails WP:GNG. Störm (talk) 17:00, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Rcsprinter123 (reason) 21:28, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Rcsprinter123 (gossip) 21:28, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ♠PMC(talk) 13:14, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:27, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:27, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 12:42, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete no evidence of notability. Nom cites possible confusion with a notable party. FloridaArmy (talk) 23:27, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, fails WP:V, as Störm points out. Smmurphy(Talk) 15:20, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.