Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Teenage Love (band)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. So Why 06:23, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Teenage Love (band)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lots of promotional fluff; one of the sources states that it's a "promotional tool." Nothing that indicates the band meets WP:NBAND. JTtheOG (talk) 03:26, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:40, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Denmark-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:40, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:41, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:41, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: the article creator Reggie.clever appears to be a WP:SPA creating a walled garden for everything to do with BHi Music Group and the artists signed to Big House Publishing, and very little of it appears to be notable. Richard3120 (talk) 15:34, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:11, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Promotion for non notable band that lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. duffbeerforme (talk) 05:24, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - borderline WP:CSD#G11. Sources are just run of the mill stuff; absolutely anyone can record anything and get it released on iTunes and plugged in blogs and local routine sources. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 11:45, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.