Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Teena Strickler Bowers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Hut 8.5 17:45, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Teena Strickler Bowers

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional article on a non-notable artist. Speedy tag removed by a technically "independent" user, but both accounts have few edits and have edited the same articles. --Finngall ^talk 00:51, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

delete possible sock or meat puppet removed the delete tag. The single reference is not independent. gsearch only finds social networking or database sites. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:14, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:15, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:15, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:15, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Walton (talk) 10:35, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - by the admission of the author of the article, this photographer is a latecomer to serious photography and has only come to the attention of her local newspaper. Fails WP:GNG at the moment. Sionk (talk) 18:36, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. What Sionk says. -- Hoary (talk) 11:26, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete the subject has not received any serious critical attention. Mduvekot (talk) 23:43, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.