Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Technika SH-Z625

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 18:29, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Technika SH-Z625 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

We don't normally do separate articles for every digital compact camera out there; even those by major manufacturers are often grouped by family or series. The Technika SH-Z625 does not appear to be notable at all; Technika is a supermarket own-brand (Tesco's) and this is almost certainly rebadged third-party hardware. The article itself reads like a features/spec list converted to prose, and gives no real indication as to how this camera differs from countless other cheap digital compacts. In short, I don't think this article has even the potential to be worth keeping, because there just isn't likely to be much worth saying about a rebadged generic digital compact. Ubcule (talk) 22:17, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:06, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:06, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:07, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment If there is an article on the generic camera family, or the most common variant from which it is rebranded, should it be merged?Billlion (talk) 18:36, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete No evidence of sufficient secondary sources to demonstrate notability. PianoDan (talk) 17:14, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment; @Billlion- Sorry for not replying earlier. Are there any sources that give meaningful background information on this model beyond a spec list and a model name (which might be absolutely meaningless by itself- we can't even assume that similarly-numbered models are related when it comes to purely badge-engineered "brands" like Technika). And even then, is there anything meaningful to be said about it? The generic camera "family" in this case would probably be the one it was technically related to, as different Technika models of the same time may be sourced from totally different places. Ubcule (talk) 23:51, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete not finding any real coverage in reliable sources. Nwlaw63 (talk) 01:59, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Found no coverage excepted for e-commerce. ~KvnG 04:58, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.