Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TechFly

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:19, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

TechFly

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:ORGSIG and appears to be self-promotional NottNott talk|contrib 15:33, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nominator. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 18:04, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:31, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:31, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:31, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:31, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:31, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:31, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: No evidence of attained notability. AllyD (talk) 08:38, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I am not seeing any significant coverage in reliable independent sources. None at all, actually, which is surprising considering the weak assertions of notability made in the lead section, barely enough to escape speedy deletion WP:CSD#A7. ~Amatulić (talk) 23:15, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as searches unfortunately founded nothing noticeably better. SwisterTwister talk 07:24, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.