Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Team H2politO

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz talk 01:54, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Team H2politO (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is still no evidence that this is an independently notable team that should have a separate article. It was prodded as "No evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Sourced only to non-independent sources, pages not even mentioning Team H2politO, and dead links," all of which is true, and deprodded on the alleged basis that this is controversial based on the talk page. I'm not sure what User:Kvng is referring to as the talk page only contains a comment from User:Camp0s from six years ago that sources were coming. I'm presuming that Camp0s has considered this complete but these sources do no indicate that this is a notable organization. Ricky81682 (talk) 05:54, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 23:06, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Could not establish notability. I thought there might be something behind dead links or in material reverted due to COI concerns but this is not the case. ~Kvng (talk) 14:09, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.