Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Teaching methods of foreign language

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Language pedagogy. As pointed out we don’t routinely merge unsourced material. Spartaz ^Humbug! 03:34, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Teaching methods of foreign language (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Largely unsourced, and reads like an essay. Redundant to Language pedagogy. power~enwiki (π, ν) 22:46, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Merry Christmas! ^{Babymissfortune} 23:17, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Merry Christmas! ^{Babymissfortune} 23:18, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge or redirect to Language education, or possibly to Language pedagogy. This looks like a well-intended contribution from a new user, and it even cites a couple of secondary sources in its current state. It does seem to duplicate other articles, though. Cnilep (talk) 02:47, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep This article is unformed in the fullest of senses. The English Language Learner is educated in multiple pedagogical methods. This should be expanded upon, and assisted. Ventric (talk) 22:22, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge or redirect to Language education or Language pedagogy. -Indy beetle (talk) 23:56, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. I'm not actually opposed to a merge or redirect, but given that this is almost entirely unsourced, I'm not sure what it would make sense to merge. And, it's an unlikely search term, so I don't see the point of a redirect (but, WP:CHEAP). -- RoySmith (talk) 01:57, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.