Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Taylor Atelian

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:13, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Taylor Atelian

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Only significant role is Ruby in the long-running According to Jim. WP:NACTOR expects significant roles in multiple TV series or films, but the actress has seen hardly any additional roles since the ABC series, other than a few appearances as herself (a pageant judge) on Toddlers & Tiaras. Her music career, including with a girl group called Pink-E-Swear, has shown little or no activity of note, and would clearly fail WP:NARTIST. And even with WP:BASIC, there are not enough independent, secondary reliable sources with significant coverage of her. (Those I have found thru Google search only have mere mentions of her, most mentioning nothing more than her celebrating a birthday.) MPFitz1968 (talk) 18:44, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – I agree with the proposition that the current article is nowhere near meeting WP:BASIC, and that the subject does not separately pass WP:NACTOR. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 21:04, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 02:10, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 02:10, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 02:10, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 02:10, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:NACTOR FWIW. Rzvas (talk) 19:29, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete does not meet our notability guidelines for actor notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 07:43, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Obviously fails the WP:GNG and WP:NACTRESS. -- LACaliNYC ✉ 19:20, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.