Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tax attribute (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Barkeep49 (talk) 01:26, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tax attribute

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No refs on the page (or at least none which show notability), seems to be a level of WP:OR and the page has been tagged as poorly written.

It seems to me like the most sensible option would be to merge with Tax accounting in the United States but I'm not sure about a redirect, as it appears that the term is used outside of the USA and as it stands the page doesn't mention other jurisdictions. JMWt (talk) 08:09, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance and United States of America. JMWt (talk) 08:09, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also to add: little cleanup action has occurred since the last nom in 2010. I think it now needs attention. JMWt (talk) 08:10, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete this is a specific taxation code definition, that has several meanings in various jurisdictions. This would need a clean up and re-write, but tax law isn't my forté. Oaktree b (talk) 16:59, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment feel free to merge anything that you think is mergeable, but I see no merit in this article as it stands. It reads like the personal statement of a tax advisor (i.e. I agree about OR), it plunges straight into a discussion of how to get out of paying tax in the US jurisdiction by exploiting a particular piece of tax legislation, without explaining what this has to do with the term "Tax attribute", and yes, those words are used for other concepts outside the US, which should at least be acknowledged. I'd have no objection to straightforward deletion. Elemimele (talk) 12:59, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.