Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tawan W. Davis

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Drmies (talk) 20:21, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Tawan W. Davis (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BIO - despite the number of references, they not establish notability. ukexpat (talk) 15:13, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard#Tawan_Davis.--Elvey(tc) 23:14, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Nothing especially notable - being able to find trivia about a person does not ensure notability. Here, "FreePressRelease" is specifically not a usable source as it states: "Free-press-release.com (FPR) is a website providing a press release distribution service." Almost all of the other sources fall under SPS as well. I do not address anything not in the current version of the BLP. Collect (talk) 13:19, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Not enough or in depth enough coverage in reliable sources. Not notable. Fyddlestix (talk) 13:47, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Fails WP:PROF. The press release cannot be used for notability purposes.~EDDY (talk/contribs)~ 13:57, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Fyddlestix (talk) 16:52, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Fyddlestix (talk) 16:52, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Fyddlestix (talk) 16:52, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Fyddlestix (talk) 16:52, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:15, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.