Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tatum Lynn

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Pax:Vobiscum (talk) 10:32, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tatum Lynn

Tatum Lynn (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability per WP:GNG, WP:BIO, or WP:NMUSIC. Being an upcoming artist with a bunch of views on YouTube is not sufficient to meet the criteria. ... discospinster _talk 17:01, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. ... discospinster _talk 17:01, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. ... discospinster _talk 17:01, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions. ... discospinster _talk 17:01, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete there is no coverage of her and I fail to see how she is notable. Praxidicae (talk) 17:57, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak keep Allmusic staff bio, news pieces, short bit from a radio station, Idolator piece, which is listed as RS at WP:MUSICRS. None of these are particularly long, and the third one may be a bit iffy as I can't quite tell if that's radio station staff or not, but there's just enough for me to lean keep, and there may be more. Hog Farm _Bacon 19:38, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep I wrote the page because I felt the producers on her new album are all noteworthy (tho that passage was removed) and also had a top 40 single and a million views on video. Believe she is worthy of inclusion, but thank you both for taking time to review. askkaty2write (talk) 20:32, 10 November 2020 (EST)

  Comment askkaty2write - if you have a source showing that this artist charted, that would meet WP:MUSICBIO criteria #1. That would really put a kabash on deleting. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 00:07, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  Comment thank you! I do have one - https://www.billboard.com/charts/adult-pop-songs/2020-02-01 - but I think you must be a subscriber to see the entire chart. I have added it in. 01:18, 11 November 2020 (UTC

  Comment Her Facebook page says the song charted at number 49 on the Billboard Adult Top 40. WP:MUSICBIO's point 2 requires only that she "Has had a single or album on any country's national music chart." WP:BILLBOARDCHARTS appears to suggest that the Adult Top 40 (Adult Pop Songs) chart applies. But doesn't number 49 mean it didn't register on that chart? -Lopifalko (talk) 09:31, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  Comment Is anyone equipped to be able to answer this please? I think the answer is pertinent to whether the subject satisfies the notability criteria. -Lopifalko (talk) 12:37, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  Comment - I think the wrong chart is likely mentioned. I think the intended chart is Adult Contemporary (chart), but I'm only educated-guessing. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 16:09, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  Comment I wonder if I can show a PDF? I do have the top 40 chart as a citation but without a sub to billboard you can't see the entire thing. I have a PDF of that page though? -askkaty2write 14:12, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment Can you let me know how , or what time line there may be, to remove the possible deletion marker on the page? Thank you. -askkaty2write 00:27, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • This will be left open at least a week from the date of the nomination, so November 17 (UTC time) will be the earliest this gets closed. It could get relisted, which would extend the time that this discussion stays open (and the deletion tag stays up) by another week. I personally think the article should be kept, but I'm not seeing an overall consensus to do so at the moment, so unless something changes in the discussion, expect a relist. Hog Farm _Bacon 05:38, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as has coverage in multiple reliable sources identified in this discussion as well as assuming WP:AGF charting on a national Billboard chart, passes WP:GNG, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 22:26, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thank you Hog Farm and Atlantic306. Are we able to have a consensus? Or it doesn't work like that? I appreciate your guidance through this.askkaty2write 13:10, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Given we have a revised chart position of 35, rather than 49, which satisfies WP:MUSICBIO's point 2. The sources do not satisfy WP:GNG, but notability has been established by the chart position. (FWIW, the sources we currently have are a) KTLA on YouTube; b) a primary source from Lynn's own Music As Therapy organisation; c) a primary source from Billboard; at Riff Magazine, a paragraph about the subject where there are paragraphs for each of a number of other musicians, in "Your Weekly New Music Discovery" — I don't know whether Riff Magazine is a reliable source; d) a feature in Phoenix New Times, a publication that only "publishes daily online coverage of local news, restaurants, music and arts, as well as longform narrative journalism".) -Lopifalko (talk) 16:34, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  Comment Sorry, I missed the fact that Hog Farm had unearthed the Idolator piece. Though it's not in-depth coverage, being predominantly an announcement, and a quote. -Lopifalko (talk) 16:37, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.