Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tatsumaki Senpuukyaku

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Street Fighter II. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:07, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tatsumaki Senpuukyaku

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No independent sources exist with enough direct coverage to WP:verify notability. Looking through the article history, editors previously agreed to turn this into a redirect, but the article was re-expanded without any real discussion or consensus. Most importantly, it was re-expanded despite the lack of sources that would comply with WP:V and the WP:GNG. Deletion is more appropriate than redirecting since this is an unlikely search term. Shooterwalker (talk) 19:44, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Street Fighter II, as per the previous discussion, with the possibility of WP:SALTing it if it becomes an article again. It's debatable whether or not it's a likely search term, and it's true it isn't as widely known as Hadouken. However, I'm certain that some fans of the series will search for it, since it is one of the better known moves in the series, so I support a redirect.--hkr Laozi speak 20:10, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 17:35, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:36, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:36, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and redirect. No assertion of or claim to notability; no citations to reliable sources. --EEMIV (talk) 18:09, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect, protect if necessary, and Transwiki to someplace appropriate if desired. Jclemens (talk) 18:49, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and redirect. Complety game-GUIDE material that is not suitable for wikipedia. – sgeureka ^t•c 05:27, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect as I still support since my proposal about 2 years ago. Nothing has changed since the. I also support salting over the redirect. –MuZemike 15:08, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.