Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tandy Tenure
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete, G3 as an obvious hoax. Blueboy96 15:44, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Tandy Tenure (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Probable WP:HOAX violation. A "proposed" scientific theory with zero hits on Google, zero hits on Google Scholar, and zero hits on either for its putative creator ... and where, despite some turgid science-speak, no details of the theory are actually presented. Fails WP:V, WP:N, and probably WP:NFT and WP:BULLSHIT as well. Possibly it's no surprise that the creator of the article is a SPA with no other edits. RGTraynor 03:19, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete pseudoscientific prattle with no actual content. JuJube (talk) 05:02, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Vacuous bullshit. -- The_socialist talk? 00:57, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Blackngold29 06:31, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per reasons above; i'd initially CSD'ed it. Ironholds 08:08, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Just seeing the phrase "proposed theory" caused my brain to switch immediately into "Delete! Remove! Eradicate!" mode. -- JediLofty UserTalk 09:24, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
so is the policy here if its not on google then delete it. i think people are better off using books instead of computers myself. google is for the masses while books are for governers & creators. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.163.137.77 (talk) 10:52, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I think in this case the policy can be summed up with, we're deleting it because it's B.S. JuJube (talk) 14:20, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.