Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TalePicker

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MelanieN (talk) 00:21, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

TalePicker

TalePicker (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No coverage in reliable sources. Google news shows only two hits, both articles unrelated to Talepicker which merely credit Talepicker for a photo. [1]. A normal Google search turns up little other than the website itself and its social media accounts. Article subject is not notable. -Starke Hathaway (talk) 12:26, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 15:55, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 15:55, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 15:55, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:44, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:44, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.