Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Takay

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Quick delete as a copy of this PR page, which is not explicitly copyleft and can therefore be presumed to be conventionally copyright ("all rights reserved"). And even if copyright weren't problematic, a SNOW delete would seem appropriate. Hoary (talk) 07:54, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Takay

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can only find passing mentions of the article subject, nothing to indicate notability. Sam Walton (talk) 00:34, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

^Delete I find less than that. Not wp:n. No significant, independent, reliable sources. DonFB (talk) 01:14, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:44, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:44, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Not so much as a single reliable source to support this glowingly promotional/non-encyclopedic article. Independent searches turn up nothing which would suggest sourceable notability. Snow ^{let's rap} 07:09, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Notability has not been demonstrated. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 23:50, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. A Google search turns up nothing. No reliable sources provided in the article. Brad v 23:59, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.