Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/T.R.A.S.H. (Tubes Rarities and Smash Hits)
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. Withdrawn by nominator ([1]) (non-admin closure) -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 00:21, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- T.R.A.S.H. (Tubes Rarities and Smash Hits) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
fails WP:NALBUMS; I can confirm that the album exists based on a quick google search, but cannot find any coverage of it that's not someone selling it...perhaps a merger to the group's main article would work, except that there's really nothing to merge. Thus, I would hereby nominate this article for deletion. Go Phightins! 02:28, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. There's a review at Allmusic, and a brief piece from SPIN. I'm sure that this would have been covered in print sources back in 1981. At the very least it should be merged to the main article. --Michig (talk) 08:03, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - This is an official Greatest Hits package of a major label band (A&M, I believe) and was certainly the subject of multiple reviews at the time of release. It's a pre-internet release, so a quick Googley Boogelly isn't probably going to find reviews in Rolling Stone, New Music Express, etc. — but rest assured that they are there. If anybody's got the Christgau record guide handy, there is probably coverage in that as well... Carrite (talk) 16:55, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:48, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Michig's expansion. There's enough coverage in reliable sources (Allmusic, Spin, Billboard) to meet WP:NALBUMS. The album also charted, albeit not very highly, on the main Billboard 200. Gongshow Talk 02:59, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep The article's current expanded state shows that WP:NALBUMS is met. Good work guys. — sparklism hey! 08:14, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Nomination withdrawn Yup, it now satisfies the criteria, and therefore I withdraw my nomination. Go Phightins! 20:29, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.