Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Töre Ak
Appearance
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 02:27, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Töre Ak (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
There is no evidence that he has ever played for Denizlispor's first team, resulting in a clear failure of WP:ATHLETE. There is insufficient coverage to merit keeping this article under WP:GNG Sir Sputnik (talk) 13:30, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 13:30, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Athletes-related deletion discussions. -- Sir Sputnik (talk) 13:33, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. -- Sir Sputnik (talk) 13:33, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: Actually there are some information about his plays in Denizlispor here. Kubek15 write/sign 15:33, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- He does play for Denizlispor but all his appearances have been for the reserves. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:35, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Article is about non-notable footballer who has only played for the reserves and I couldn't find significant coverage of his exploits. Jogurney (talk) 18:16, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - fails WP:ATHLETE and WP:GNG. GiantSnowman 19:59, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - fails WP:ATHLETE. Canals86966 (talk) 02:44, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - fails WP:ATHLETE and WP:GNG Steve-Ho (talk) 11:43, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete does not achieve notablity standards under any guideline or rule I can think of.--Paul McDonald (talk) 03:54, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.