Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Szekely moustache

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy deleted. Nonsensical. Standard ethno-national provocations and fabrications fare. El_C 18:32, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Szekely moustache (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable - unable to find sources indicating this is a notable topic, unless such sources exist in Hungarian. If it does happen to be notable, I would argue that it would better fit somewhere under Székelys. Apologies if I picked the wrong categories, I have trouble figuring out which a moustache would belong to.

It is referenced in this paper, but I don't see enough coverage to warrant an independent article.  A S U K I T E   14:28, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions.  A S U K I T E   14:28, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions.  A S U K I T E   14:28, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Romania-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:31, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hungary-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:32, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Nonsense. Borsoka (talk) 14:53, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Current unref article is a load of turd. Doing a WP:Before all I can find is a small mention in a research article about Szekely Gates, and another about heraldry so no sign on SIGCOV. Delete and lif refs can be found it can be started again, we won't be losing much.Davidstewartharvey (talk) 15:04, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - articles about supposed ethnic stereotypes should always be backed up by reliable sources, for obvious reasons. There appears to be a pattern of concern building on some of these Székely-related articles that don't follow NPOV. It seems "Székely" + "Bajusz" does come up with a lot of images but I'm not sure that there are enough WP:RS going into detail about this subject. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:29, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete trash page. Borsoka and KIENGIR, I think something has to be done about this troll. I think he should be reported. Super Ψ Dro 15:41, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I opened a sockpuppet investigation against him. He is obviously Hortobagy's sock. Borsoka (talk) 15:51, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, I've much earlier draw the attention of this dangerous trolling, recently I noticed more pages has been vandalized. Super Dromaeosaurus, as you may see, Borsoka already have made a step.(KIENGIR (talk) 16:00, 13 February 2021 (UTC))[reply]
• Delete, trash, not article. --Norden1990 (talk) 11:07, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Strongly keep (Redacted) Magysze (talk) 16:39, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.