Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Synthkid

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Deleted as a G5 for being created by a blocked user in violation of a previous block Bsa dow ski1 04:35, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Synthkid

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This page is about Sarey Savy, an artist whose article has been created and deleted more than 20 times under various titles, which has led to page-protection and the prevention of the creation of any articles with his name in it, which is why this article is titled Synthkid.

Sarey Savy is much closer to notability than he was in 2008. However, I still don't believe he's quite there, as the article as it stands today does not show him meeting any of the 12 criteria laid out at WP:MUSICBIO. If I'm wrong, and Savy does meet the criteria, then we can remove all of the page protection mechanisms and rename the article to Sarey Savy. —Soap— 03:26, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per nomination and lack of notability per WP:GNG. My76 Strat 03:29, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment There are sources are stated on the third rule of WP:GNG. There are sources that show notability for info on the article. (The Ultimate Fohawk! (talk) 02:47, 12 January 2011 (UTC))[reply]

Keep i agree with —Soap— but, according to WP:MUSICBIO he meets criteria number 9 "Has won or placed in a major music competition" which is America's Got Talent. I think that we should have faith and believe that this article will be notable soon. (Highlyintense2546shineon (talk) 06:19, 11 January 2011 (UTC)) User is a confirmed sockpuppet.--Korruski^Talk 15:22, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep this article has basically only one reference but, he may be notable under Criteria 9 of WP:MUSICBIO i think this kid is gonna make it but, i think the author should find more reliable references. (Dramaroxsmysoxs (talk) 06:23, 11 January 2011 (UTC)) User is a confirmed sockpuppet.--Korruski^Talk 15:22, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep meets at least one of the criteria of WP:MUSICBIO. (The BeautifulDream (talk) 06:28, 11 January 2011 (UTC)) User is a confirmed sockpuppet.--Korruski^Talk 15:22, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

All three of the above keep votes are from accounts who have made no other edits, and all three votes were posted within 10 minutes. Obvious socks are obvious. I'll be at SPI if anyone wants me.--Korruski^Talk 10:03, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:17, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep meets at least one of WP:MUSICBIO. (Forget the past (talk) 00:22, 12 January 2011 (UTC))[reply]

New user account with no other edits, another sockpuppet? Mattg82 (talk) 00:27, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No sorry, i am a real user sorry i just started a few minutes ago but, did go through a few pages to find references and edit. (Forget the past (talk) 00:37, 12 January 2011 (UTC))[reply]

OK sorry my bad. Mattg82 (talk) 01:19, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's ok i get it and i see as the 3 accounts above but, what do you think on the article? I think it's notable because, it meets at least one of the criteria on WP:MUSICBIO he has placed in a major music competition. (Forget the past (talk) 01:47, 12 January 2011 (UTC))[reply]

"Weak Keep" there is bare significant coverage but, as far as hearing his song "Murderer" on the radio goes, he seems notable as far as WP:MUSICBIO goes. (Goalswork (talk) 02:08, 12 January 2011 (UTC))[reply]

"Keep" per goalswork the article follows one notability on WP:MUSICBIO yet weak on WP:BIO. (The Ultimate Fohawk! (talk) 02:45, 12 January 2011 (UTC))[reply]

Delete No reliable sources or significant coverage from mainstream media to indicate notability as defined by WP:GNG. Article deleted before see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarey Savy. Mattg82 (talk) 03:49, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kill it with fire, already! – Nearly EVERY contributor to this article and every "keep" !vote in this AFD is a User:Channel 6 sock. –MuZemike 04:32, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Subject, in fact, does not meet Criteria #9 of WP:MUSICBIO. The requirement does not say "appeared in a major music competition," but, in fact, says "placed" in one. According to this article itself, he was the third of 40 people to be eliminated from a single, special episode of AGT. Am I incorrect in reading that as "placed 37th in a single episode of a television competition"? That, by itself, is not enough to overcome the more general failure to meet the criteria of WP:GNG. The "references" appear to either not meet WP:RS or to be mentions in passing (like the listings on the radio stations). Qwyrxian (talk) 04:35, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.