Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Syed Naseer Ahamed

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Nakon 04:56, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Syed Naseer Ahamed

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to fail notability guidelines, and totally lacks references. Sammy1339 (talk) 03:06, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 03:54, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:50, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:50, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:50, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment He has book reviews: [1], [2] and [3]. I haven't added them to the article because I was not sure if they are RS. 24.151.10.165 (talk) 17:41, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 05:10, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Another jihad-lauding niche writer with fans putting cruft on Wikipedia. Insufficient (if any) RS. Pax 06:54, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination, due to lack of coverage by reliable publications/sources. Regards, Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 18:39, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom fails WP:GNG lacks reliable references.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 10:20, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.