Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Syed Ehtisham Munir

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was deleted as A7, G11. (non-admin closure) — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 09:49, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Syed Ehtisham Munir

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Blatant non notable covert UPE article on a non notable entrepreneur who lacks in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources independent of them thus fail to satisfy WP:GNG nor do they satisfy WP:ANYBIO Celestina007 (talk) 16:42, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 16:42, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 16:42, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Central Asia-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 16:42, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 16:42, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 16:42, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - clearly non notable. No RS I could find to establish notability. Pahunkat (talk) 17:31, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - autobiographical spam on a non-notable entrepreneur with zero coverage in reliable sources independent of him Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:54, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Only source is very dubious, it makes him sound like he is very famous but a quick google search doesn't return anything beyond the article itself. 15 (talk) 19:44, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: As per the rationale by Celestina. Kichu🐘 ^{Need any help?} 00:22, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: WP:SELFPROMOTE. Article creator's username says it all. Excommunicato (talk) 03:14, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- And not just the username — the creator happily admits this on their user page. --DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:28, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Looks to me A7/G11 speediable, even (or have I missed something?). --DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:25, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: per nom, fails WP:BIO + WP:GNG CommanderWaterford (talk) 17:05, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - creator now indeffed for spamming and self-promotion. I've requested A7 and G11 deletion for this. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:44, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.