Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swati Mohan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep per WP:SNOW. (non-admin closure) ~ Ase1este_{charge-parity}^time 13:06, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Swati Mohan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Extremely narrow coverage mostly by tabloids. I'm not sure if the meets the nobility criteria. Seems like WP:TOOSOON. RationalPuff (talk) 00:05, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. RationalPuff (talk) 00:05, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions. RationalPuff (talk) 00:05, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. RationalPuff (talk) 00:05, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. RationalPuff (talk) 00:05, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. It's worth noting this article was created less than two hours ago and is still very much under development. However, the coverage in CNET, Space.com, and The Sunday Guardian seems sufficient to justify keeping the stub. GorillaWarfare (talk) 00:11, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Refs are from NASA, India Times, CNET, The Sunday Guardian, and Space.com, none of which are tabloids. WP:SIGCOV meets WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO. Schazjmd (talk) 00:15, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Ditto from above - India Times, CNET, and Space.com, are not tabloids. As for WP:ANYBIO, being an Ops Lead and public figure for a flagship NASA Mars mission surely counts as a "widely recognized contribution that is part of the enduring historical record in a specific field." Lamacha9617 (talk) 00:28, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep sufficient references and more becoming available. John Cummings (talk) 00:51, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep More content would be added as time goes by. She is a notable engineer responsible for the first successful Mars Rover Perseverance- a historical event.--செல்வா (talk) 01:18, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Meets the GNG with the sources provided. --Goldsztajn (talk) 02:44, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:51, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:51, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep clearly notable for their role in the recent mission. Elliot321 (talk | contribs) 05:32, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep this is absolutely an article worth keeping, and is actively being expanded on Yitz (talk) 07:32, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Subject clearly meets both WP:GNG and WP:BASIC. She has received specific and significant coverage in several reliable sources including CNET, The Hindu Times, News18, WBIR (10News), The Times of India, Gulf News and many others. None of these sources are tabloids. Mw learner (talk) 09:57, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as others have said - I've nothing else to add. -Kj cheetham (talk) 10:53, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, bad timing? An AfD of an article of a major person on the Mars 2020 team might have been thought out just a little bit more. Randy Kryn (talk) 11:57, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.