Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swans (EP)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 05:12, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Swans (EP)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Searched and cannot establish this as Wikipedia-notable outside of an Allmusic review. Lachlan Foley (talk) 05:12, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep AllMusic establishs notability. This is the debut release by this band and at worst should be redirected to the Swans discography article. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 12:28, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Swans releases generally received reviews from multiple print sources, and these may not be found online. The fact that they exist is sufficient. --Michig (talk) 19:21, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Question Why delete instead of redirect? This user has created about a dozen of these album deletion requests and has yet to explain why they should be deleted and not simply redirected. Note that if they are redirected, the categories should remain and {{r from album}} should be added. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 15:45, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Why delete a release that's obviously notable? Stop wasting other editor's time.--Soul Crusher (talk) 19:15, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:34, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep A deletion outcome would be extremely rare in the case where a band has a full length article as a redirect is the described process at WP:NALBUM. The album title is hard to search for sources because of its name with the bird and matching the band title, but based upon the reception it received at AllMusic I don't think there isn't an assertion of notability, or that its a sub-article that should not exist. Mkdw ^talk 06:36, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.