Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suzanne Kendall Osborne

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 00:09, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Suzanne Kendall Osborne

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable artist. Only ref is self-published. jsfouche ☽☾Talk 00:18, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete notability is not inherited, and there is little evidence of notability in her own right Ohconfucius ^¡digame! 02:28, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 19:59, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 20:00, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete: No assertion of notability, no apparent notability. Toddst1 (talk) 23:07, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete per lack of third-party sources, I didn't find any on both Yahoo! and Google. SwisterTwister talk 02:27, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.