Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sussy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. ✗plicit 01:13, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sussy

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Created only for a meme. The three entries are the meme, one obscure person, and something with a different spelling entirely. -1ctinus📝🗨 00:59, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Remove the questionable def and we still have a pretty solid disambiguation page which just needs spelling from templates added. Nate • (chatter) 01:04, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment @1ctinus: I did not create the article for the meme but rather because the meme introduced sufficient entries for the requirements of a disambiguation page. I've made over 60 different disambiguation pages for different reasons and one of them is because a trending topic is going to have people searching for it on Wikipedia. So in this case, a new or unregistered user is likely to search "sussy" in Wikipedia looking for some encyclopedic information on why it's a meme (since articles or sections for other specific memes exist on this site), and a disambiguation helps guide them to what they're looking for, in this case, "sussy". Since the meme does not have its own article or enough independence from Among Us to have its own, it is incorporated within the article courtesy of me, with references provided. A popular topic that does not have its own article or even just a section still can be entered into a disambiguation page as long as there's an actual mention explaining it. I also would like to point out that having a disambiguation page prevent new or unregistered users from going ahead and creating an article on such a minor, specific topic that may violate any guidelines and therefore prevents the worst case of the namespace from being blocked from creation. WaddlesJP13 (talk | contributions) 01:35, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Meme's been nixed, and now we have a totally normal, albeit humourously named to some people, disambiguation page. casualdejekyll (talk) 01:53, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:52, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

- Comment' WaddlesJP13 restored it, but there are more important things going on than arguing about this. A redirect for the Among Us slang to Among Us#Continued popularity (where Sus (meme) goes to) might be more appropriate (and I note I haven't heard of 'susy' being slang at all until today). Nate • (chatter) 09:01, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  - I've taken note of your comment and have created a better link for the entry (Sussy (meme)). WaddlesJP13 (talk | contributions) 19:35, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The meme appears to be a valid entry (WP:DABMENTION), but even without it there are two eligible entries already. – Uanfala (talk) 20:56, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I've found a guitarist and a place where Theobald of Provins lived (and "hermitted") too. Clarityfiend (talk) 21:58, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Perfectly valid disambiguation page with legit entries. As for whether it was created because of the meme... inspiration comes from many places. Helen(💬📖) 23:21, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.