Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Susanna Ng

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 20:12, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Susanna Ng (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

BLP of a music executive where notability seems uncertain to me. There are quotes by her and coverage in affiliated sources but I’m not seeing in depth coverage in RIS. Mccapra (talk) 13:16, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 13:16, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 13:16, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 13:16, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Taiwan-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 13:16, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: please bear in mind she is a music EXECUTIVE. You probably are expecting the kind of media attention music ARTISTS get. For some in music publishing, this is as notable as it gets. A real trailblazer in Asia. If you don't immediately recognize her notability in the music industry after reading the sources, then I'm not sure what would convince you. TanookiKoopa (talk) 16:33, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - and that's why most music executives aren't notable. Accomplished, but not enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 17:06, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: I'm not finding much by way of English-language sources, but I wonder if there is non-Western coverage? Someone with more expertise than me would have to weigh in. Gnomingstuff (talk) 05:37, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete No indication of being notable. Fails WP:SIGCOV. scope_creep^Talk 16:41, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the Article Rescue Squadron's list of content for rescue consideration. TanookiKoopa (talk) 00:14, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.