Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Survivor Sucks (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The article was deleted in 2008 according to the closing admin's deletion log. I believe that the closing admin userfied the article by restoring it but then neglected to redelete it, but there are some technical wrinkles I can't explain. In any event, the article, as deleted, is not that different from the article as it currently stands. Therefore, I see no reason to relist this discussion to obtain more !votes. Bbb23 (talk) 01:17, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Survivor Sucks

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article Survivor Sucks appears to fail WP:GNG and WP:WEB. The article is about a forum based on the show Survivor, the references are not independent of the subject, and need to be to satisfy the inclusion criteria for a stand-alone article or stand-alone list. Paul "The Wall" (talk) 15:36, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Also it seems like the consensus was to delete on the 2nd nomination Paul "The Wall" (talk) 15:38, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2013 March 18. Snotbot t • c » 16:15, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:WEB. That's really odd that it failed the 2nd AFD but doesn't seem to have been deleted. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 21:22, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.