Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Superweapon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Nakon 01:05, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Superweapon

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article does not have a source and seems to be made up of several contradictory original researches by several editor, resulting a Chimera article.

I tried a search myself and its seems mainstream media chiefly uses the term either as peacock term or as a relative term that compares with "weapon". See: [1][2][3] Codename Lisa (talk) 23:02, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Listing V1 etc. is no complete nonsense, but after all this is still a personal list: delete. –Be..anyone (talk) 09:47, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - The first problem is that this page is mistitled. It should be List of weapons regarded as superweapons. That's not a dictionary definition, a subject to which superweapon would seem to be inevitably consigned. Assuming a name change, it's a matter of sourcing — which the current piece does not have. It does seem like a very reasonable and probably sourceable list, however, which puts me square in the middle. Carrite (talk) 16:56, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"Regarded" is a weasel word. Regarded by whom? (Unless the answer is "the whole world", WP:NOTESSAY.) In my sources above, Su PAK FA, an unmanned sub and a ship-grade cannon are called superweapons. Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 17:56, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 19:32, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 19:33, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Weapon of mass destruction. Pax 07:32, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.