Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Super Deluxe

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. J04n(talk page) 13:59, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Super Deluxe (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No substantive refs for notability at all. Sources tell us that the domain name is registered and that the company exists but nothing else. A search throws out a few items such as this but nothing at all substantive appears. Fails WP:GNG  Velella  Velella Talk   22:25, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WP:KEEP The Super Deluxe page is verified, please remove the "considered for deletion" notice as soon as possible. Check below for verifiable sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SuperDeluxeBloom (talkcontribs) 23:09, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Substantive Verifiable Sources:
http://www.superdeluxe.com/
https://www.facebook.com/superdeluxevideo/
https://www.youtube.com/c/superdeluxe
https://vimeo.com/superdeluxevideo
http://variety.com/2015/digital/news/turner-resurrects-digital-content-venture-super-deluxe-exclusive-1201600066/
http://time.com/4240298/straight-outta-compton-trailer-oscars/
https://www.oxygen.com/very-real/this-boss-ass-btch-cartoon-celebrates-empowered-ladies
http://www.papermag.com/kanye-west-ellen-appearance-super-deluxe-1815857214.html
http://www.afterellen.com/people/477419-jen-tullock-hannah-pearl-utt-disengaged — Preceding unsigned comment added by SuperDeluxeBloom (talkcontribs) 22:46, 26 May 2016 (UTC) SuperDeluxeBloom (talkcontribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
  • Keep. One of the links in the mess posted above me here goes to a different Variety article about Super Deluxe from last October that says that it's the primary hub for primarily- or only-online content from Turner Broadcasting. Any such branch of Turner would probably be notable without question if it were a television network or a magazine or something, and I'm not seeing why this is different. Although since the Variety piece also says that this project doesn't have a lot of attention right now, I wouldn't get upset to see this article folded into Turner Broadcasting System... RunnyAmiga (talk) 17:46, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep
WP:KEEP: Based on the articles published by Variety, their Facebook page and their YouTube channel, the information in the article is valid.
http://variety.com/2015/digital/news/turner-resurrects-digital-content-venture-super-deluxe-exclusive-1201600066/
http://www.superdeluxe.com/
https://www.facebook.com/superdeluxevideo/
https://www.youtube.com/c/superdeluxe — Preceding unsigned comment added by Losangelesfan03 (talkcontribs) 18:43, 2 June 2016 (UTC) Losangelesfan03 (talkcontribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Comment - please read WP:GNG before coming here with comments. Facebook and YouTube and all such social or vanity sources are not acceptable as references on Wikipedia. This is a discussion about notability and not how many user-names you can invent in order to comment here.  Velella  Velella Talk   19:59, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nakon 04:45, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America1000 16:02, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. North America1000 16:02, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America1000 16:02, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

References

  • Wallenstein, Andrew (October 30, 2006). "Super site for Turner". The Hollywood Reporter.
  • Wallenstein, Andrew (October 6, 2015). "Turner Reboots Digital Content Venture Super Deluxe (Exclusive)". Variety.
  • Roettgers, Janko (March 1, 2016). "Turner's Super Deluxe Is Building a Video and Gif Aggregation Site (Exclusive)". Variety.
  • Mahan, Colin (October 30, 2006). "Turner goes Super Deluxe". TV.com.
  • Comment - That's all still only coverage to suggest it has gotten said coverage now, but nothing yet actually suggesting the solid independent notability for its own article, the other alternative would be to move and link to Turner Broadcasting System...thus my "independent notability" notation. SwisterTwister talk 22:10, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Additional Links:
Yoshiman6464 (talk) 04:16, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.