Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SuperStock

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 16:50, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

SuperStock

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to be a non-notable, generic stock image provider, failing WP:GNG and WP:ORG, due to the lack of reliable, independent sources covering the company in depth. Tagged as failing GNG since October 2012. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 20:33, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:03, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:03, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:03, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: I found no significant coverage per WP:CORP. SL93 (talk) 01:07, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - No significant coverage. They were mentioned as part of a21's bankruptcy here. -- Whpq (talk) 15:43, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.