Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sunita Verma

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 05:52, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sunita Verma (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

NO headlines or news sources about her. Prasanth202 (talk) 02:49, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Stuck sock vote SD0001 (talk) 17:32, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Prasanth202 (talk) 02:49, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:07, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete mayors are not default notable, and nothing suggest Verma is an exception to this general rule.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:49, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: No significant coverage; Sources only mention about their removal. Ab207 (talk) 14:17, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 22:52, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Mayors are not eligible. Elected politicians are eligible.Priyanjali singh (talk) 16:17, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Sources don't meet WP:GNG or WP:NPOL. BEFORE showed nothing notable except removal.   // Timothy :: talk  18:49, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Mayors, even in large cities, are not automatically entitled to an instant notability freebie just because they're technically verifiable as existing — the way to make a mayor notable enough for inclusion is to write a substantive article that demonstrates her political importance, not just to write a 22-word stub which fails to go any further than stating that she exists. Bearcat (talk) 17:20, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.