Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suman Koli

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Geschichte (talk) 19:26, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Suman Koli

Suman Koli (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails to establish notability criteria. Cannot find any independent sources covering about the person independtly Shahoodu (talk) 13:02, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2020 December 27. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 13:30, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Agree. The page fails to meet notability criteria. Further, the information given in the page is wrong. Bharatpur was not a corporation in 2014.^[1] (Ashique2020 (talk) 14:20, 27 December 2020 (UTC))[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. ^{Engr. Smitty Werben} 14:36, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. ^{Engr. Smitty Werben} 14:36, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. ^{Engr. Smitty Werben} 14:37, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, The subject was covered only once and that was due to her election to the Municipal body. This will fail WP:BLP1E and WP:GNG. This is not a major election so WP:POL is not met. Walrus Ji (talk) 17:27, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep : An elected mayor clearly meets notability criteria.!! The inadequacy of online news about her is evident here.however there is a some of news at the regional language 1 ,2,3 Pass WP:GNG and WP:POLITICIAN -- Padavalam🌂  ►  21:18, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete-Changed my position because of the lack of reliable sources-- Padavalam🌂  ►  12:20, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• • Padavalamkuttanpilla, I can read the Hindi language script so here is my response on your links.
    • [1] is not even about Suman Koli, it is about another person (a Kerala mayor). It only has a 2 line passing mention.
    • [2] is a list of young mayors with 2 line info for each
    • [3] is a 2 min video where the subject is asking citizens to follow lockdown restrictions.
  • None of these qualify as significant coverage. So these cannot be used to claim a passing WP:GNG. WP:POL is failed by a long shot. Walrus Ji (talk) 11:00, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, mayors are not assumed to be notable by virtue of being elected. The sources provided show the barest of passing mention and a google search doesn't result in anything better either. Tayi Arajakate _Talk 06:48, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, mayors are assumed to be notable if they are elected. But the sources provided barely proves that. I cannot even find a single independent source about this person ~~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arunkalissery (talk • contribs) 08:12, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Not a notable politician by the position they hold or coverage. Fails WP:NPOL. RationalPuff (talk) 10:48, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.