Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SumZero

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. L Faraone 00:19, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

SumZero

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a WP:Advert. FusionLord (talk) 07:46, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. czar · · 08:03, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and improve: yes it's definitely written in a promotional tone at the moment, but that can be fixed. The site is notable, with a good deal of WP:Secondary coverage online, so I'll try to tone down the worst of the promo now. Captain Conundrum (talk) 13:00, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done, but perhaps further improvement can be made. Captain Conundrum (talk) 13:26, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar · · 17:22, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:07, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mediran (t • c) 03:01, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2013 May 15. Snotbot t • c » 06:02, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Has it been revised? Please point out any remaining instances of WP:AfD. - 64.134.46.169 (talk) 02:57, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. It is a not so notable company formed by notable people. Thus, indirectly it is notable. The article may be improved, but definitely cant be deleted. DebashisM^Talk 13:13, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Divya Narendra#SumZero. I don't agree with the WP:INHERIT argument since only one of them currently meets WP:BIO. Most of the sources given are either press releases or not independent, meaning it does not meet WP:WEB. A mention in the notable founder's article should suffice. Funny ^Pika! 17:53, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.