Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sue Googe

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:52, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sue Googe

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Recently created BLP with only one source - Mlpearc (open channel) 04:15, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:47, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:47, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:47, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete because, though there is widespread coverage about her use of a possible copyright infringement with her campaign logo, it has scant biographical info. This article has clearly been written because she is standing for US Congree at the moment. Let's bin it for now and see whether she gets elected. Fails WP:POLITICIAN. Sionk (talk) 07:20, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and above - David Gerard (talk) 10:15, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as not only has this been absolutely bombarded with PR affects and users, but the contents are exactly that, and that's why it's not surprising there's no actual substance, because those were not the intentions here, PR was. SwisterTwister talk 06:12, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails NPOL as still only a candidate, fails anybio as WP:BLP1E on the Google stuff. John from Idegon (talk) 06:15, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:NPOL if we discount the usual coverage and in any case this is a BLP1E. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 11:39, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.