Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sudhanshu Rai

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 21:47, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sudhanshu Rai (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

End-to-end WP:PROMO. Fails WP:GNG, WP:NACTOR. Lacks WP:RS/WP:RSP. Possible WP:COI/WP:UPE. Creator of this page has also created a page Detective Boomrah, a project directed by this entity which itself lack notability. - Hatchens (talk) 07:16, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@DMySon, again i want to say i am involved in COI and UPE. Subject passes GNG because he has coverage in Reliable publications like The Hindu and Indian Express and also he directed the web series Detective Boomrah which is a notable web series as you can check its reviews on google and also directed film chaipatti and its reviews also available on google. So if he doesn’t passes Nactor but he is notable film director and storyteller according to his work and sources. -IndaneLove (talk) 08:58, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.