Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Subhrojit Saha

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Guerillero ^{Parlez Moi} 10:12, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Subhrojit Saha (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I was going through this article and saw that the subject is failing WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG, as the references are about his breakup, and relationship. According to GNG the subject should have in-depth coverages from reliable sources. But the subject doesn't have a single source which is in-depth and reliable. And according to me the reviewer of the article should be more sensitive because the reviewer reviewed the article after 3 minutes right after the editor finished the article creation. So i thing the reviewer User:Fitindia should be more sensitive during the time of reviewing article. As he has 70k + edit count. Nomadwikiholic (talk) 18:02, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Nomadwikiholic (talk) 18:02, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:47, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment Nomadwikiholic, this is not the place for negative comments about the Wikipedia volunteer who reviewed the article (an endless and thankless task). MrsSnoozyTurtle 01:37, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  @MrsSnoozyTurtle:What do you expect from a new user with less than 50 edits, jumping into AFD nominations ? Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 16:53, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:25, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep: As playing a significant role in 3 notable TV shows is enough to pass WP:NACTOR and out of all three tv shows he played the lead role in 2 of them. Also, it should be noted that the first point under "A topic is presumed to merit an article if:" at WP:GNG reads " It meets either the general notability guideline (GNG) below, or the criteria outlined in a subject-specific notability guideline (SNG) listed in the box on the right" and in that case WP:NACTOR #1 is met "Has had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions". 113.193.45.34 (talk) 19:25, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Inadequate nomination. Notability criteria are met. Doczilla _{@SUPERHEROLOGIST} 03:37, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.