Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/StudyPool

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 01:55, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

StudyPool

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An advertorially-toned page on an unremarkable private company. Significant RS coverage not found; what comes up is passing mentions and / or WP:SPIP. Does not meet WP:NCORP / WP:CORPDEPTH. Created by Special:Contributions/Olurteilanru with few other contributions outside this topic. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:21, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:39, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:52, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:52, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:53, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: fails WP:SIGCOV. Nothing remarkable here and WP:TOOSOON to warrant its own page. Marquardtika (talk) 13:23, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Redditaddict6 9 22:59, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete References fail the criteria for establishing notability, mostly failing ORGIND and/or CORPDEPTH. Topic fails GNG and NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 17:31, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails GNG and CORPDEPTH. Lovelylinda1980 (talk) 09:55, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.