Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stuart Heritage (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 12:41, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Stuart Heritage

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Previously deleted as failing WP:AUTHOR as well as WP:GNG because the article relied on primary sources, his written work published by the newspapers he writes for and there was no significant coverage of him or reviews of this books. Funnily enough, those are precisely the issues that persist in the re-created page, tagged as such and indeed now AfD'd for a second time as such. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 07:36, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Authors, Journalism, and United Kingdom. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 07:36, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Complete failure of WP:NBIO and WP:NAUTHOR. Most of the references are to works by the author himself, not a shred of independent coverage. And this is cause for concern also. SpinningSpark 18:15, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 10:05, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, nothing to indicate notability.TheLongTone (talk) 11:54, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.