Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stratics (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 04:21, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Stratics

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Website doesn't meet the general notability guideline. I looked and could not find reliable, independent, third party sources. Some PR stuff and primary sources. Heads up that there are multiple companies and sites using this name. Jontesta (talk) 00:22, 11 May 2020 (UTC) Jontesta (talk) 00:22, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Jontesta (talk) 00:22, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails GNG and I don't think it will ever pass it. Also an overuse of external links outside of external links section. dibbydib ^boop or _snoop 02:00, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 02:12, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 02:12, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - As I'm looking through the previous AfD nomination results, I'm failing to see why there was such a resounding vote for keeping this article. There are six sources for this article - three are alexa ranking and whois statistics, and the other three are from the website itself. Searching for this website reveals no coverage; most instances of the name appearing instead refer to an unrelated telemarketing company of the same name. At most, some of this information can be transcluded to the community section of the article for the game that this site covers. Tpdwkouaa (talk) 02:35, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per the above: no significant coverage. Its boasted 176,414 rank (as of 2014) on Alexa Internet (as of 2020-05-11, it's actually 468,540) is also quite indicative of this. For comparison, the also-unnotable Gematsu hovers around 18,790. IceWelder [✉] 16:22, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - article just does not seem to pass WP:GNG. Videogameplayer99 (talk) 03:12, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.