Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Strangers (upcoming film)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Atlantic306 (talk) 19:17, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Strangers (upcoming film)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per WP:TOOSOON and WP:NFF, only coverage has been an announcement of the film, no indepth coverage of the topic is available BOVINEBOY2008 20:40, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and United Kingdom. Shellwood (talk) 21:26, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Has received wide coverage: [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. The Daily Beast and Little White Lies in particular provide the authors' commentary and analysis and thus constitute significant secondary coverage. Passes WP:NFF as filming has begun. Nardog (talk) 04:10, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:25, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - As per above, there is wide coverage such as in Daily Variety. Zeddedm (talk) 04:19, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Nardog, who makes a convincing argument. Contrary to nom, NFF doesn't apply because production has started. —Danre98^{(talk^contribs)} 03:56, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.