Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Story Of The Naga king

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 02:22, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Story Of The Naga king

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Self-admitted to be a original story put on Wikipedia to gain attention. PROD was contested and it doesn't fit any speedy deletion criteria, so I am listing it here. I was tempted to IAR delete it, but I guess it doesn't really hurt to have it linger around another week. ThaddeusB (talk) 05:11, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete barely any ghits. Not published or by a notable author. Clubmarx (talk) 06:12, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom Francium12 (talk) 12:10, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MrKIA11 (talk) 13:56, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Wikipedia isn't scratch space for developing one's fiction writing skills. And I agree that this would have been an appropriate use of WP:IAR.-- Whpq (talk) 17:17, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. —Taelus (talk) 13:43, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Ugh - CSD/IAR axe it anyway. --EEMIV (talk) 15:12, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per everyone. Edward321 (talk) 09:04, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete — a week is long enough to troll most any discussion into a no consensus. Don't miss the talk page. Cheers, Jack Merridew 11:53, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Snowball delete – There's nothing more I can add than what the others already have above. Omai. As far as the comment on the talk page is concerned, omai. MuZemike 00:49, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.