Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Storage model
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus, defaulting to keep. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 18:36, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Storage model (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
We are not a dictionary. —— Eagle101 Need help? 03:39, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:WINAD --Haemo 06:29, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep as the article tries to introduce a notable concept, for which a number of references exist that also discuss different types of storage models.[1]--Tikiwont 10:58, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Haemo.IntinnTalk! 09:47, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete WP:WINAD. dcandeto 16:52, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete unless expanded and referenced As is, the article is just an unreferenced dictionary definition of the term. Delete unless it can be expanded to include some encyclopedic information about what a Storage model is, or its history or popular usage, etc, with some proper references for verification. Dugwiki 18:57, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep This is a valid stub which provides a basis for further improvement. Many stubs start as dictionary definitions. Deleting them simply makes it harder to start an article, so that one person must create it from scratch. This is contrary to the Wiki principle of collaboration and a major reason for keeping expandable stubs. Fg2 01:40, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Please note this sentence from WP:WINAD: "a stub encyclopedia article looks very much like a stub dictionary article". This is a stub. Also, if this is indeed suited more for Wiktionary, shouldn't it be transwikied before being nominated for deletion? -- Black Falcon 04:12, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep expandable stub. —David Eppstein 08:14, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Tikiwont. SirSam972 23:38, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.