Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stieff Silver

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. --Coredesat 19:38, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Stieff Silver (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

This article is unotable and written un-encyclopedically NauticaShades 09:44, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Ok, it's been re-written now. NauticaShades 07:33, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete company fails WP:CORP, although I suspect an article could possibly be written about their former factory as "the site is a national historic landmark". Kavadi carrier 10:19, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above. MER-C 12:49, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete also per above. --Ling.Nut 20:03, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. It was a notable manufacturer of silverware. I found the following description: "Kirk Stieff Company, acquired by Lenox in 1990, is the business descendant of two famous 19th century companies, Samuel Kirk & Son and The Stieff Company. Samuel Kirk & Son, founded in 1815, is America’s oldest silversmith. The Stieff Company, founded in 1892, is known for its exacting reproductions of historical patterns, many of which can be found in the Smithsonian, and its expertise with the repoussé method of working silver."[1] --TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 20:47, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Historic manufacturer and independantly sourced. --Oakshade 23:19, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per TT. -Royalguard11(Talk·Desk·Review Me!) 03:59, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Added two independent print references for notability. Edison 05:23, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Added one independent print reference. --Stieffers 21:36, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep now that article expands on the history of the company. Good work. Kavadi carrier 23:07, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per the above commenters. Yamaguchi先生 06:39, 9 November 2006

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.