Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve Pavlina

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 06:29, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Possible Vanity Page/Advertising. No real content whatsoever/ Geedubber 06:03, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per WP:BIO, WP:VAIN, WP:SPAM, and WP:NOT. Royboycrashfan 06:04, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per reasons listed by Royboy --TBC^{??? ??? ???} 06:05, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:BIO. --Silvestre Zabala 10:39, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above. --Khoikhoi 17:42, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Steve Pavlina is one of the primary figures in the movement to bring personal development information to individuals over the internet. The personal development sector has traditionally been limited to books and audio materials, and Steve Pavlina is arguably one of the most prominent figures in the new web-based human potential movement. Niche bloggers such as Atrios, Glenn Reynolds, Eugene Volokh and Markos Moulitsas Zúniga all have Wikipedia entries, and the growth of Pavlina's site indicates that he will soon reach an audience as large as any of these bloggers. This article should be kept and expanded. Zukin 01:24, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Your examples are not comparable. Instapundit, Daily Kos, and Huffington Post are not small time niche blogs blogs. If, and when, he reaches as large an audience as these blogger then he can have a page. Wikipedia is not a crystalball.--Geedubber 05:09, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per NN. Arbusto 06:58, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete nn. MaNeMeBasat 14:16, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete This is like putting a subject in university to study a random person. Pep talk makes people feel great, but that is all. Ancos (talk) 04:14, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.