Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sterling Award

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 13:42, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sterling Award (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article has been tagged for notability for over 7 years!! No evidence of notability per sources that would establish WP:GNG. The sources I see on the Google appear to be of the press release or blog nature. Team-specific awards rarely do. Much of this could be condensed and included in New York Mets award winners and league leaders. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:48, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Baseball-related deletion discussions. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:48, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:48, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Google is full of stories about the annual winners. No sense clogging up the page for the Mets' MLB award winners with this list of minor league winners. - Bbny-wiki-editor (talk) 20:42, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  Bbny-wiki-editor, like this and like this, yes. That hardly makes the "award" notable; the players are. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:25, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Announcements of winners by the Mets doesn't constitute independent coverage. (And besides, it's the Mets.) Clarityfiend (talk) 21:53, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  Clarityfiend, ha! – Muboshgu (talk) 22:40, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Fails WP:GNG for the lack of significant coverage in secondary sources. This was the best I could find on the subject [1]. Bbny-wiki-editor's argument is invalid because notability isn't inherited from the players per WP:NOTINHERITED. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 09:54, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Worse yet, that scottsdaleindependent.com reference is about a different Sterling Award altogether: "The awards will honor businesses in four categories: micro business; small business; big business; and non-profit.".

• Delete. Some representative search results (actually, all the results which looked worth opening on the first three pages of a Google search for 'sterling award baseball'):

1. Luis Santana Named Sterling Award Recipient. (1) That's about the player, not the award. (2) It's a Mets' publication, and not independent.
2. Mets announce 2018 Sterling Award winners. The page is headed 'a New York Mets community'; it isn't independent.
3. Ross Adolph Earns New York Mets’ Sterling Award. That's about the player.
4. METS ANNOUNCE STERLING AWARD WINNERS. Brooklyn Cyclones' website; and (you guessed it) the Cyclones are part of the Mets organisation.

Fails WP:GNG for lack of significant coverage addressing the topic directly and in detail. Narky Blert (talk) 10:12, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.