Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephen Akintayo (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:03, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Stephen Akintayo

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Like the previous Afd (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephen Akintayo), which closed less than a year ago, non-notable and promotional. Also quite clearly WP:COI / WP:PAID concerns. Loksmythe (talk) 22:51, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Loksmythe (talk) 22:51, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:52, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Undisclosed paid, promotional article, built on a single source which is a dead link Naleksuh (talk) 23:42, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This article should not be deleted because it does not violate Wikipedia’s copyright policy. It contains no redundant or overused template. There are reliable and authorized sources for the content on the page. The article also meets the notability guideline as it is verifiable. The article adheres strictly to the speculations on adding information about living persons to any Wikipedia page, in all applicable laws in the United States. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Saconsultglobal (talk • contribs) 11:42, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - That is one of the weakest arguments for Keep I have read, that an article should be Kept because it is not copyvio. But Robert McClenon (talk) 19:35, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Promotional, and does not satisfy general notability. Robert McClenon (talk) 19:35, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete — Non notable “serial entrepreneur” as he lacks in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources. Celestina007 06:36, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, Not enough reliable sources to prove notability. Alex-h (talk) 07:30, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: per all of the above Olaf Kosinsky (talk) 19:24, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and blatant promotion. --Kbabej (talk) 15:54, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.